ADVISORY: This post includes the frequent use of language that may be offensive. I typically keep the language PG or somewhat tame, but this post is as an exception. I will use tags to indicate posts that include nsfw language.
I don’t remember where this comment was found among the multitude of blogs but the drivel it imbues is representative of a world view that not in some small way projects an inexact interpretation of reality. Perspectives like this one require that one believes in the absolute inferiority of females as contributors to the creation and maintenance of civilization and its societies, the inability or inclination to think and behave rationally and a propensity toward deceit and dishonor. Sadly, evidence of these and similar beliefs is abundant:
Our social edifice is made by and maintained by men, to serve *women’s* long-term interests. It sacrifices male *comfort*, men’s lives, for female comfort and survival.
The pay off is expanded male reproductive *duty* and, critically, unambiguous lineage.
This suggests that men reproduce solely because they are dutibound and not biologically driven to impregnate as many viable females as possible to ensure survival of their genetic material into the future. That, if left to their own devices, men would prefer to shoot blanks when they have sex and die off as a species all together if the pay out was NSA sex.
In this vision of reality, men, perhaps as a function of their superior nature among all carbon based life forms, have transcended what biological imperatives and trappings other living creatures remain subject. Instead, this one half of the human species, alone among the inhabitants of earth, have complete self-agency, divorced from their organic composition that gives them the power to decide and the will to act based entirely on their independent powers of reason and impartial judgment that is untainted by the influence of biological process or design.
Does this not sound just a little too stupid to be correct? Is anyone else noticing the gaping absense of rationality that this world view requires in order to believe its’ precepts? It argues against itself.
Where i come from, we call that crazy.
It doesn’t help that it causes some women to laugh at these men, further widening the gap between them. Though, to be honest, that gap is probably nature’s way of selecting against sane women mating with irrational men.
Guys that think and behave according to these beliefs do not produce offspring with rational women of normal or more intelligence.
They mate with women that conform to their vision of reality. This would include women with pronounced personality disorders, stunted cognitive development and insight, delayed or diminished control response, and those with character flaws similar to those associated with substance disorder and antisocial disorder.
Epigenetics to the fucking rescue, I say.
As far as lineage goes, men are concerned about it, women not so much. Women know without any uncertainty whether or not the child they give birth to is their biological offspring (and the distinction needs to be made, now, since, technically, women can bear children that are not genetically “theirs”, i.e. surrogates).
Men do not know without uncertainty that they fathered a child born to a woman. Thus, they have created varying means of acquiring that certainty over the ages-some preventative (such as chastity belt like devices), some post-event such as DNA testing.
Prior to this, the world over could be overheard arguments based on logic such as ‘well no one on MY side of the family ever had ears that big.” and “ask any one and they’ll tell you that this kid doesn’t look anything like his father but is a spitting image of the guy who cleans their pool. Seriously. You need to check that out.” And, “I know I’m not that baby’s father because it don’t look nothing like me and I know that whore’s been sleeping around.”
You don’t often come across people saying “oh my god do you see this baby she just delivered? There’s no way that she’s the mother of this baby.” or “I have some serious doubts about this baby I’m carrying. I’m really worried that after I give birth, I’ll find out it isn’t even mine.’
But, according to theories of evolution, the name of the game in life is genetic survival. Motivation to ensure that one’s genetic material survives into future generations inspires everything alive to sexually reproduce. People do this traditionally by coupling up into male/female pairs and copulating. By hook or by crook, it doesn’t matter.
In the rest of the animal kingdom, males deal with the lineage problem by doing things like eating or killing the offspring of his potential mate that he did not sire (a real turn on that would be for any female, right? Kind of a mood killer, no?)
Some creative critters go about dealing with any insecurity about their paternity preemptively by leaving their penis inside the female to serve as a sort of plug to bar entry by the next guy that might come along and try to inseminate the female. I guess this is a situation where speed matters: the sperm that can cross the finish line the fastest, wins. Eliminate any competing swimmers, and, well, there you have it. A fixed race.
Then there are animals that bear litters of offspring that can have multiple fathers. Your dog, Lucy, conceivably, can have a litter of puppies that include any mix of breed physically capable of mating with her. So, if Lucy is Great Dane, there is little worry to have that one of her puppies will be part Chihahau. Not without some accomodations made on his part, anyway.
This is also a good reason to think it through before choosing one of those sample sized cross breeds if it’s a female.
Anything could happen when ‘Who let the dogs out?”
Using another, less erudite example, this comment was lifted from the same thread as the first, which was on the topic of women and to some extent what they really want from a man:
“As long as they get drama, the occasional shiny bauble and muh dik”
Well, there you have it.
Women’s ‘long term interests’ are really no different than men’s. At least for those men that successfully impregnate women. Her long term interests are to ensure the survival of her offspring and ensure her own survival to reproduce and even perhaps to ensure the survival of her offsprings’ offspring.
Comfort is a nice bonus, but hardly necessary. Hate to be the one to tell you this, but there is inherently NOTHING comfortable about the entire reproductive process for women.
Beginning with menarche, the actual bleeding, cramping business, sore breasts, headaches, hormonally driven crazy making, potential for death during childbirth, the sex act, itself, pregnancy (try shoving a bowling ball deep in your gut somewhere between your stomach and your intestines, carry it around for the better part of a year then force it out an opening the size of a quarter, then talk to me about comfort, k?), breast feeding, or menopause.
Not one damn thing. And, not excepting even the embryonic development of a female’s life, she bears the uncomfortable consequences of being a female every minute of every day of her existence. In today’s world, this includes any potential existence, as technology has allowed for the detection of biological sex for the purpose of terminating a pregnancy of an undesirable gender.
In the most populated and impoverished areas of the world, male offspring are exclusively most desired. Female infanticide is also problematic in those parts of the world that favor sons, making the ability to abort female embryos a very real concern, as it is hidden from external awareness and has the potential to create imbalance to the ratio of men to women.
When a population has more men than it has women, there are potential societal and global consequences that are significant and alarming.
So, do excuse me, a female, for seeming as if I am seeking some external source of comfort to compensate for what a pain in the ass it is to be female.
It is not, however, innate to female human beings to require comfort as a condition of reproduction. There is a population of men that apparently have absolutely no awareness of a woman’s capacity to endure and tenacity to ensure her children survive.
If men are attracting into relationships women that behave like children and make material demands to satisfy their entitlement needs, that reflects on their patterns of choosing women inappropriately equipped for long term successful relationships that include parenting children.
Men who marry and have children with women ill-equipped reap what they sow, as it were. If the woman you are considering good enough to bear your children has clearly indicated she is a crazy, untrustworthy, self absorbed bitch you really have to ask yourself if it is any surprise that 10 years later this same woman has raped you of everything you have worked so hard to earn, dumped you for a guy that makes more money and destroyed your relationship with the child(ren) you created with her.
That’s what fucked up people do. Men and women.
The lesson is not that all women will do this therefore beware of women. The lesson is to recognize why you accept inappropriate behavior and take risks in relationships with women that are fucked up for whatever reason.
Figure out how to be attracted to another type of woman. You may not want to believe all women are not wired the same way thereby making you accountable for making a poor choice, but what you believe is true doesn’t change reality. Just your ability to perceive it accurately and live effectively as a result. Just saying.
And, doesn’t the grass always seem greener on the other side? Because, as a female, if I were a cynical, ignorant femnazi type, I might look at the life of males and think it’s pretty cushy and convenient.
No fuss, no muss.
If I’m a big enough guy or can fake my way through the day, all I need to do, really, is wake up, get some food and water in me, avoid being killed by anything (including my own stupidity), find as many females that are either willing to let me fcuk them or that i can overpower and fcuk by force without serious repercussion, and then go to sleep.
How hard is that? I have no need to worry about anyone but my goddamn self. If I fcuk often enough, chances are I’m going to successfully pass on my genetic material, so my work is done. Life is fucking good.
And if I were a female viewing men from that perspective I might be prone to resent men giving me grief about any goddamn thing at all about how inconvenient it is for them to show any effort whatsoever in their life while demanding that I do more.
Yes, I suppose that could be the start of some considerable man hate. but, fortunately, thank God, most women realize (are sappy enough) that this can’t really be the way it is.
We must not be understanding something. So, we are perpetually confused for the greater good.
To be continued ….